register to attendUpcoming Webinar: June 21st 2013, 10 am PTMoving From Passive to Interactive Video Experiences with Mark Jacobs

Random Notes from STC12 in Chicago

Wow, it is amazing how tired you can get after two days of…well…just sitting around and listening to other people talk. I mean, I spoke for one hour this morning, but man I am beat. Okay enough complaining. Before I leave windy Chicago, I wanted to take a moment to jot down some general notes from the conference.

The Good

  • Well-organized. The conference was organized very well. The STC has this conference thing down. After all, they’ve been holding conferences for 59 years. If you haven’t figured it out in that amount of time, well…
  • Upbeat mood. The mood was quite upbeat, especially compared to last year. Last year’s mood was downright terrible. This year, people seem to be generally happy and there is a lot of positive energy.
  • Lots of tweeting. I think that the tweeting really helped the mood. Tweeps tend to tweet positive things, such as thanking presenters for doing a great job, scheduling times and places to meet with each other, and more. There was a significant number of people on Twitter (and those who were not, were “dared” to get on).
  • More customers. This year, I noticed more companies sending their doc managers, tech writers, strategists, and so on. Over the past few years, as budgets were tightened, there were more contractors and vendors than actual customers. I was very excited that a number of my customers sent attendees. This is a good sign for the industry and a good sign for the economy in general.
  • The Hyatt is huge. But, they seem to have things figured out, too. Everyone was very friendly and accommodating. I particularly appreciated the free Internet everywhere. Why is it that the most expensive hotels tend to charge the most for Internet access which really should just be free everywhere??
  • Lots of learning. The sessions that I attended had very good speakers who were extremely well-prepared on their topics. I tried to go to a variety of sessions – everything from DITA basics, to corporate case study examples, to extremely geeky HTML5, and things in between. I found just about all of the sessions I attended to be engaging.
  • Excitement in sessions. The “lightening round” sessions were very exciting. At least that’s what I read on Twitter. I was actually in other sessions during those. But I followed along.
  • Schedule relief. Instead of 5 sessions per day, there were 4 sessions per day. This gave everyone a nice 3 hour chunk of time in the middle to catch up on email, take a walk, meet new people, and just chill a bit.
  • Vendor Expo. The vendor expo was a very nice venue and a good size for the number of vendors that had booths. There weren’t as many vendors as in the past, but this is the “good” section, so I won’t digress.
  • New connections. I know that I am not the only attendee who met a lot of really nice, interesting people. The colleagues we meet at these industry events often become life-long friends. You look forward to seeing them once or twice a year at conferences. I was really happy to see so many of my buddies. And I made some great new connections, too. There was a lot of business card dancing going on.
  • Shining Chapter. I think the Chicago chapter deserves a special shout-out. They really were organized and very helpful. It is a lot of work to host an event of this size. Hats off to them.
  • Happiness. I got a really cute koala from Kirsty Taylor.

The Not-So-Good

I am not going to be a killjoy and complain about the conference. I really hate it when people bellyache. That said, I’d like to give just a little constructive criticism. Take it for what it’s worth.

  • Power strips. If I had one large pet peeve, it was that the conference rooms did not have power strips. At least none of the rooms I sat in had them. Thank goodness we had a 3 hour break in between the morning and afternoon sessions. I had to recharge my computer because there simply weren’t enough outlets and wall seats to use them.
  • Internet access confusion. I went to the Content Marketing Strategies conference a few weeks ago. They solved all of the hashtag and Internet password confusion by attaching a small sticker with the important information to each person’s badge. That would have been helpful and saved a lot of confusion early on the first morning. Or, print it as part of the badge.
  • Twitter handles. Speaking of badges, it would be really great if the STC would start printing our Twitter names on our badges. I tweet as ContentRulesInc. If you don’t know what I look like, you probably wouldn’t know that ContentRulesInc is Val Swisher. I think this would be fairly simple to add to the badges. Then, when I see “LetsDoTheChaCha,” I’ll know it is Sally Mae. Because her name and her Twitter name will be right there on her badge.
  • Food. For the amount the STC charges, you’d think they could at least give you a cookie at 3:00PM when you’re having a blood sugar event. Enuff said.
  • Equipment. I happened to be the unlucky person whose STC-rented computer started beeping incessantly and died in the middle of presenting. No one had checked to make sure it was plugged in properly. When I checked, it “looked” plugged in. And, really, I wasn’t there to check. I was there to speak. Luckily, I’ve been presenting since some of the attendees were toddlers, so I just rolled with it. These things happen. And this just happened to occur during my session. And I’m doing the writing here.
  • Attendance. From what I heard, there were about 800 attendees. “Back in the day,” we’d get 1,800 attendees. I’m talking back back in the day, when money flowed and and so on. It would be great if the STC could attract a larger crowd at these events. Then the energy really would go up-up-up.
  • Vendors. There were only half a dozen or so rows of vendors. The booths were nice. The people manning the booths were friendly and knowledgeable. But, where did all the vendors go? The last time I had a booth at an STC conference (Seattle years ago), there were a lot more vendors. I could be remembering this wrong, but there were so many vendors that I was able to dodge someone who I didn’t want to see. This year, there would have been no place to hide.

In Summary

  • I am glad I attended.
  • I learned some interesting things.
  • I made some interesting friends.
  • I enjoyed presenting to interested people.
  • I’d love to attend again and speak on topics that are of interest to you.
Discuss
Blog · Content · May 22, 2012
 

 

 
  • http://twitter.com/arnoldburian Arnold Burian

    Good comments, Val. This is my first conference, and I’m enjoying it quite a bit. To me, the best part is meeting everyone for the first time. Hopefully, we’ll get to meet on Wednesday.

    • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

      So sorry we didn’t get to meet, Arnold. Hopefully we will see each other soon – Lavacon?

      • http://twitter.com/arnoldburian Arnold Burian

        Soon, I hope. I’ll have to look into Lavacon.

  • MJ O’Neill

    Hi Val!  Interesting to hear that vendor presence was low compared to other years.  I’ve heard from one vendor who said that they wanted to attend, but had trouble getting responses from STC.  https://twitter.com/MindTouch/status/204593220498358273 & https://twitter.com/MindTouch/status/204663320362483712

    Maybe there was a problem this year somewhere?

    • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

      I was wondering where Mindtouch was. I was surprised that I didn’t see them. I wonder if there is a story behind that… hrmmmmm. ;-)

  • http://adamgetsaround.tumblr.com/ Adam Evans

    Good comments, Val. I agree on several points. Specifically providing food and having more vendors (some tried to come and weren’t allowed by STC).

    • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

      Really? I wonder why?

  • http://www.thecontentwrangler.com/ Scott Abel

    And, lest you forget, you got to spend time with me (and at least your laptop didn’t fly off the podium like Karen McGrane’s did). LOL

    • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

      OMG! Did it really? Whoopsie!! yes. I should have said that the BEST part of the trip was spending time with you. And it was! :-)

  • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

    How about they need to make the whole process simpler? Because you should be able to figure it out without instruction…afterall, this is the STC, no?!! They should ask us for our Twitter names when we fill out the registration. Then, they could just include them on the badge. :-)

  • Andrea Wenger

    I also wish we could edit our badge information. I was disappointed that my badge listed my company name and address, rather than the city where I live and my community affiliations. Twitter handles should also be included.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sarahbaca Sarah Hollenbeck Baca

    Quick comment – last year, Rhyne (Robert) had these awesome tags that had the QR code and Twitter ID on them. Not sure if he was just too busy this year or what, but we should definitely make sure that happens for #stc13. I found out I could go at the last minute or I would have organized something. Also, I was surprised that you experienced the energy as negative last year. That was not my experience at all, but that’s probably mostly because it was my first year on the CAC and I was very excited about getting into STC.

    • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

      Thanks for your comment, Sarah. QR codes would have been really super. I didn’t even think about that. Regarding last year – you know, we all have our own interpretations. I was comparing last year to “the years of yore…” when there were well over 1,000 attendees and the vendor expo was very large. That, in and of itself, generates a lot of buzz. My experience last year (I manned a booth at the expo most of the time) was…blah. I look forward to meeting you at STC13.

      • Mellissa Ruryk

         I skipped using my real name badge all week and had a laugh introducing myself as “The Official” Summit Bag… Nicky Bliel had a fit when she saw what I had done and told me quite seriously that that wasn’t the correct name tag.  No duh!

  • http://twitter.com/MichaeRonquillo Michael Ronquillo

    Good to know that the energy was positive as compared to last year due to the economy. Let’s hope this continues in the next couple of years!

  • Lori Meyer

    Thanks for sharing your perspectives, Val. Excellent points, all. I would also like to see a way we can edit our badges, and I agree that Twitter handles would be a great addition to foster communication. And yes, more refreshments and more power strips.

    The sessions were of very high quality overall.Congratulations to the program team and the presenters. The Leadership program was a real success…highly recommended for Summit 2013!

    My hat is also off to the Chicago chapter for being such welcoming hosts and adding some Blues Brothers fun to the Monday evening musicfest with the fabulous Rough Drafts.

    Overall, a great conference…even though I had to spend the last day with my right arm in a cast!

    • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

      Did you party too hard at the banquet and break your arm?!!!! 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1511803268 Rick Lippincott

    Regarding the size…don’t forget that the STC has shrunk considerably since those peak attendance days. You would get about 1800 in the late ’90s when STC membership was 26,000. That’s about six or seven per cent of total membership attending. Now the STC is around 6,000 members with 800 at the conference, that’s  about twelve per cent attending. The numbers have dropped, but there’s a higher rate of participation.

    • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

      Well, that would make sense, Rick – the folks who are still members are the serious ones then. They go to conferences and are more involved. I guess the STC has to figure out why the membership has shrunk so much (I wrote about my views on this years ago) and try to increase the overall membership.

  • Tom Glennan

    Thanks for taking the time to pull this well-written summary together, Val. I’m a member of seven years from the Southeastern Michigan chapter, who attended the Sacramento Summit last year (my first one) and came away questioning the value of attending annually. If your positive comments are indicative of the value of attending, I may seriously making the trip to Atlanta (?) next year.

  • Pingback: Afterglow from STC Summit 2012 « Barrie Byron's blog

  • http://twitter.com/InEveryLanguage Terena Bell

    Thanks for the great summary, Val. Do you think this is something that would be helpful for translation companies to go to?

    • http://www.contentrules.com Val Swisher

      Well, Terena, hard to say. For the most part, I’d say no – and the reason is that in my experience, content development and localization are usually separate (silo’d too often, in fact). The majority of my content development managers have nothing to do with translation whatsoever. Many don’t even know who has that function in their company! If you are thinking about going to learn more about content creation, it is an interesting conference. If you think you may get leads out of it, I doubt much business will come from it. (my 2 pesos) 

  • Pingback: Blogging, Blogging Everywhere | STC Technical Communication Summit 2012

  • http://www.facebook.com/leah.guren Leah Guren

    Good summary. Just two things: STC is always trying to improve attendance numbers! And back in 1998 when the conference was in Anaheim, we had about 3000 attendees. Then we stayed in the 1500 range for several years.

  • Pingback: Blogging, Blogging Everywhere | STC Technical Communication Summit 2013

Get the Scoop

our monthly dose of compelling content delivered to your inbox

strategy | development | globalization writing | terminology | XML | ebooks

 

Recent Posts